L’écocritique : une problématique  Compte-rendu des approches écocritiques suivi par l’étude d’une pièce iranienne contemporaine

Rahmatjou, Hamidreza

doi:10.22067/rltf.2022.75684.1040

L’écocritique : une problématique Compte-rendu des approches écocritiques suivi par l’étude d’une pièce iranienne contemporaine

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Hamidreza Rahmatjou

Professeur assistant,, Universite Khurazmi Iran

10.22067/rltf.2022.75684.1040

Abstract

As a recent approach in the human sciences and in literary criticism, ecocriticism animates a fundamental antagonism: to displace the human being in favor of a certain autonomy or even a philosophical and aesthetic self-sufficiency of Nature. It is no exaggeration to say that this debate is at the origin of the theoretical and methodological bifurcations in the field of ecocriticism since its emergence in the 1990s. Our study tries, as far as possible, to go around the ecocritical approaches especially Anglo-Saxon to finally address the ecocritical approach proposed by Félix Guattari who will represent the French perspective in the ecocritical debate. To do this, we will be particularly interested in Three Ecologies (1989), Guattari's most solid ecological writing, where the philosopher proposes his famous idea of "Ecosophy", thus opening up a whole new perspective in the ecological reading of cultural works: a perspective based essentially on questioning the relationship between human subjectivity and its ecological, environmental and social exterior. Then, we will try to deploy this conceptual tool that Guattari offers us by looking at a contemporary Iranian play which does not reveal, at first glance, any interest for a classic ecocritical reading to see how, in the absence of any explicit theme linked to non-human nature, the ecocritical approach can still retain its relevance.

Keywords

cologie

cocritique

l&rsquo

environnement et la litté

rature

Fé

lix Guattari

Ecosophie

Subjects

french literature

ایگلتون، تری. (1395). پیشدرآمدری بر نظریه ادبی. ترجمه عباس مخبر، تهران، نشر مرکز.

ثمینی، نغمه. (1399). نمایشنامه برای سه اتاق و یک پشت بام، تهران، نشر نی.

جواری، محمد حسین. (1397). نقد محیط زیستی در ادبیات با رویکرد تطبیقی، پژوهش ادبیات تطبیقی، دوره 6، شماره 2، 128-143.

ساداتی، سید شهاب الدین و همکاران. (1398). هویت های مکانی شده : مطالعه فیلم درخت گلابی با رویکرد نقد زیست محیطی، نقد ادبی، شماره 47، 136-117.

فکوهیان، ناصر. (1386). پاره های انسان شناسی، تهران، نشر نی.

معینی، سولماز و همکاران. (1400). ضرورت ها و الزامات نقد زیست محیطی با نگاهی به کاستی های آن در مقالات ایرانی، نقد ادبی، شماره 54، 188-145.

Carson, Rachel. (1963). Printemps silencieux, traduit par Jean-François Gravrand, Paris, Plon.

Chelebourg, Christian. (2012). Les écofictions, mythologies de la fin du monde, Clamecy, Laballery.

Fœssel, Michael. (2012). Après la fin du monde, critique de la raison apocalyptique, Paris, Seuil.

Glotfelty, Cheryl & Fromm, Harold [dir.]. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, Athens, Georgia University Press.

Guattari, Félix. (1989). Les trois écologies, Paris, Galilée.

Lytle, Mark Hamilton. (2007). The Gentle Subversive: Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, and the Rise of the Environmental Movement, New York, Oxford University Press.

Morton, Timothy. (2010). The Ecological Thought, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

Naess, Arne. (1973). The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology movement, Inquiry, University of Oslo, 56-88.

Phillips, Dana. (2003). The Truth of Ecology: Nature, Culture, and Literature in America, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Posthumus, Stephanie. (2017). French Ecocritique: Reading Contemporary French Theory and Fiction Ecologically, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

Posthumus, Stéphanie. (2014). Ecocritique et Ecocriticism, La pensée écologique et l’espace littéraire, Université du Québec à Montréal, vol. 36, 15-33.

Posthumus, Stéphanie. (2017). Écocritique : Vers une nouvelle analyse du réel, du vivant, du non-humain, Humanités environnementales : Enquêtes et contre-enquêtes, éds. Guillaume Blanc, Élise Demeulenaere, Wolf Feuerhahn, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne, 161-180.

Send comment about this article

Name *

Enter Name.

Email Address *

Enter a valid email address.

Affiliation *

Enter a vaid affiliation.

Comments *

Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)

Security Code *