Translation as Journey: a Hermeneutical & Dialectical Approach to Translation

Document Type : Original Article

Author

nosrat hejazi

10.22067/rltf.2023.81273.1075

Abstract

Linguistic theorists consider translation as a container conveying concepts and ideas. On the other hand, culturalists do not recognize translation as a “conveyor” or a “pure circuit”, but rather think of it as a “communication bridge” between various linguo-cultural semiosphere. Meanwhile, the hermeneutic approach based upon ideological & dialectical opinions _ and principally those relying on philosophical stances of George Steiner _ interprets translation not as a container or as a bridge, but as a journey from "self" to "other"; A journey in which the translator-traveler leaves her linguo-cultural semiosphere during the four stages of "submission", "aggression", "incorporation" and "restitution" to get back _ once totally metamorphosed and once it deems “other”_ to its primary semiosphere.

This paper aims to investigate the dialectical confrontation of "I" or "self" with "other" in the translator-traveler trajectory and seeks to take note of the gradual rooting of colonialist ideas in hermeneutic approaches to translation. The question that arises is how ontological transformation occurs throughout this cognitive journey and how "self" and "the other" reach reconciliation and theoretical unity after confronting each other? It seems that the ontological transformation is achieved once "self" becomes "not-self" and the "other" turns into "not-other" reaching somewhere the zero point of balance. This is exactly where the traveler-translator brings a new epistemological experience to the fore.

Keywords

translator-traveler

initiative-ideological journey

dialectics

hermeneutic(al)

self vs other

Subjects

• french translation

---

References

Aveling. H. (2004). A short history of western translation theory. TEXT. 8(1)

Baker. M. (2018). Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. New York: Routledge.

Barthes. R. (1973). Théorie du texte. Encyclopédie Universalis. [en ligne], consulté le 4 avril 2023. URL : https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/theorie-du-texte/2-la-theorie-du-texte/

Carzacchi Fonda. M. (2002). Voyage au bout de l’erreur. Des traductions cocasses. Italies. 6. 429-449. DOI : 10.4000/italies.1630

Desmet. M. T.K. (2001). Intertextuality/Intervisuality in Translation: The Jolly Postman’s Intercultural Journey from Britain to the Netherlands. Children’s literature in Education. 32 (1). 31-43.

El Medjira. N. (2001). Fidélité en traduction ou l'éternel souci des traducteurs. Translation Journal. 5(4).

Even-Zohar. I. (1990). Polysystem Studies. Poetics Today. 11(1).

Issartel, L. & Derivois. D. (2012). Interpréter et traduire la demande d’asile. Quel travail psychique ? ERES. Cliniques Méditerranéennes. 85(1). 271-284. 

Greimas. A.J. (1972). Sémantique Structural: Recherche de méthode. Paris: Larousse.

Lavault-Olléon. E. (2004). Traducteurs, traductologues, théories et pratiques: petit état des lieux. Traduire. Revue française de la traduction. Société française des traducteurs. 203. 7-24..

Leonardi. V. (2019). Fighting Inferiority: Negotiating Identity and Otherness through (self) translation. I-LanD Journal. 2

Lotman. Y. (2005). On the Semiosphere. Sign System Studies. 33(1) : 205-229.

McElhanon. K. A. (2005). From word to scenario: The influence of linguistic theories upon models of translation. Journal of Translation. 1(3). n. p.

Moskovitz. C. (2012). A Journey to Translation. World Literature Today. https://www.worldliteraturetoday.org/journey-translation, retrieved 23/9/2019.

Raková. Z. (2014). Les théories de la traduction. CZ : Masarykova Univerzita.

Rani. K. S. (2004). Writer-translator discourse: Translating Australian Aboriginal women's writing. Translation Today. 1(1).

Roux-Faucard, G. (2006). Intertextualité et Traduction. Meta. 51(1) : 98-118.

Schleiermacher. F. (1999). Ueber die verschiedenen Methoden des Uebersetzens. Des différentes méthodes du traduire. Paris : Le Seuil.

Steiner. G. (1998). After Babel. Une poétique du dire et de la traduction. Paris : Albin Michel.

Thriveni. C. (2002). Cultural elements in translation: The Indian perspective. Translation Journal. 6(1).

Venuti. L. (2006). Traduction, Intertextualité. Interprétation. Palimpsestes. “Traduire l’intertextualite”.18: 17-42.

WhosOn. (2019). The Journey of translated live chat session. UK. Retrieved 23/9/2019. https://www.whoson.com/translation/the-journey-of-a-translated-live-chat-session/